Document Type
Research Article
Abstract
The concept of conditioning edentulous ridge mucosa has gained momentum over the last several years. Frequent relining of the complete denture may be required because of soft tissue changes arising from underlining bone resorption. Patients with the maxillary flabby ridge had difficulty in tolerating hard denture, inadequate retention, and stability of a complete denture are often encountered, so the denture can be made more comfortable using soft liner. Hardening of the soft liner with time, harboring of bacteria, and debonding from denture base is a major drawback of soft lining materials. Introduction of liquid-supported dentures, to be an alternative to conventional complete denture prosthesis in cases suffered from inflamed tissues and severely resorbed edentulous ridges. A liquid supported denture provides an alternate treatment option due to its soft and flexible intaglio surface allows better distribution of masticatory load stress since in such cases. Liquid supported acrylic complete denture can be useful as a permanent solution in edentulous patients with the atrophied ridge. Liquid supported denture could be a useful alternative for soft relining materials
Keywords
Liquid supported denture, Flabby ridges, Glycerin, Flexible tissue surface, Soft linerABSTRACTRESEARCH ARTICLE
How to Cite This Article
Abdulkareem, Hawraz S. and Salem, Salem A.
(2021)
"Management of Flabby Ridges using Liquid Supported Denture,"
Polytechnic Journal: Vol. 11:
Iss.
1, Article 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v11n1y2021.pp27-31
References
Atwood, D. A. 1963. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J. Prosthetic Dent. 13: 810-824.
Basker, R. M., J. C. Davenport and J. M. Thomason. 2011. Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient. John Wiley and Sons, United States.
Boere, G., H. De Koomen and C. L. Davidson. 1990. Liquidsupported Dentures. Part II: Clinical Study, a Preliminary Report. J. Prosthetic Dent. 63: 434-436.
Carlsson, G. E. 1998. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. J. Prosthetic Dent. 79: 17-23.
Chase, W. W. 1961. Tissue conditioning utilizing dynamic adaptive stress. J. Prosthetic Dent. 11: 804-815.
Crawford, R. and A. Walmsley. 2005. A review of prosthodontic management of fibrous ridges. Br. Dent. J. 199: 715-719.
Dammani, B., S. Shingote, S. Athavale and D. Kakade. 2007. Liquidsupported denture: a gentle option. J. Indian Prosthod. Soc. 7: 35.
Davidson, C. L. and G. Boere. 1990. Liquid-supported dentures. Part I: Theoretical and technical considerations. J. Prosthetic Dent. 63: 303-306.
Kelly, E. 2003. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J. Prosthetic Dent. 90: 213-219.
Magnusson, B., H. Engström and K. Kahnberg. 1986. Metaplastic formation of bone and chondroid in flabby ridges. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 24: 300-305.
Zarb, G., C. Bolender, J. Hickey and G. Carlsson. 1997. Boucher’s Prosthodontic Treatment Foredentulous Patients. Mosby, St. Louis, MO.
Publication Date
6-30-2021
Follow us: