•  
  •  
 

Corresponding Author

Zaitoon A. Hamad

Authors ORCID

0000-0002-9109-9549

Document Type

Research Article

Abstract

According to this research probe the correlation between fingerprints and the gender for all 10 fingerprints. For this inquiry, 4939 samples were collected from 247 females and 247 male’s ages between 7 and 13 years old. This is the first systematic research of its kind to check at ten fingerprints for people from Koya, Kurdistan region north of Iraq. As per the findings, gender identity is accurate for people with any of their ten fingerprints. After magnifying the obviously acquired photos, the four basic fingerprint structures were identified and registered: Arch, Radial loop, Ulner loop, and Whorl. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square analysis to determine the interaction and pattern between fingerprints and sex. The study show that, Archs (316), Ulnar loop (1450), Radial loop (1346), Whorl (1827). Out of which Arch’s male = (8.21), female = (9.08), Ulner loop, male = 42.44, female = 38.04. Radial loop, male = 33.93, female = 39.73. Whorl, male = 51.55, female = 48.44 were noticed With respect to gender, these proportions of overall fingerprint patterns in both hands were significantly positive (χ2 = 15.28, P = 0.00159). P < 0.05 indicates that the data are vital. Gender has no effect on fingerprint pattern distributions. As a consequence, there is a relationships between fingerprints and gender.

Keywords

Arches, Fingerprints, Gender, Loop, Radial, Ulner loop, Whorls

References

Adebsi, S. 2009. Fingerprint studies-the recent challenges and advancements: Aliterary view. Internet J. Biol. Anthropol. 2(2): 1-9. Avery Robert, D. 2011. The Scientific Study of Finger Prints and How it is Used in Society.

Basu, A. 1976. Digital dermatoglyphics of three caste groups of Mysore. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 45(3): 437-441. Bhat, G. M., M. A. Mukhdoomi, B. A. Shah and M. S. Ittoo. 2014. Dermatoglyphics: In health and disease-a review. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2(1): 31-37.

Bhavana, D., J. Ruchi, T. Prakash and J. L. Kalyan. 2013. Study of fingerprint patterns in relationship with blood group and gender-a statistical review. Arches. 1(1): 15-17.

Gutiérrez-Redomero, E., A. Sánchez-Andrés, N. Rivaldería, V. Alonso-Rodríguez, J. E. Dipierri and L. M. Martín. 2013. A comparative study of topological and sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in Argentinian and Spanish population samples. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 20(5): 419-429.

He, S. and S. H. G. Chan. 2015. Wi-Fi fingerprint-based indoor positioning: Recent advances and comparisons. IEEE Commu.Surv. Tutor. 18(1): 466-490.

Henry, E. R. 1900. Classification and Uses of Fingerprints. George Rutledge and Sons, Limited, London. p54. Joshi, S., D. Garg, P. Bajaj and V. Jindal. 2016. Efficacy of fingerprint to determine gender and blood group. J. Dent. Oral. Care Med. 2(1): 103.

Kumar, L., S. S. Agarwal, K. H. Chavali and S. C. Mestri. 2009. Homicide by organophosphorus compound poisoning. Med. Sci. Law. 49(2): 136-138.

Mirakovits, K. 2016. Forensic Science: The Basics. CRC Press, United States.

Mohsin, T. S. and H. S. Hasan. 2020. The relation between left thumb fingerprint types with blood groups and gender among students of Al-Kindy College of Medicine. Prensa Med Argent. 106: 1-3.

Nithin, M. D., B. M. Balaraj, B. Manjunatha and S. C. Mestri. 2009. Study of fingerprint classification and their gender distribution among South Indian population. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 16(8): 460-463.

Rastogi, P. and K. R. Pillai. 2010. A study of fingerprints in relation to gender and blood group. J. Indian Acad. Forensic Med. 32(1): 11-14.

Verbov, J. 1970. Clinical significance and genetics of epidermal ridges-a review of dermatoglyphics. J. Invest. Dermatol. 54(4): 261-271.

Publication Date

12-30-2021

Download

Included in

Life Sciences Commons

Share

COinS