A Comparative Study of Different FANET 802.11 Wireless Protocols with Different Data Loads

Authors

Ghassan A. qasmarrogy, Department of Communication and Computer Engineering,College of Engineering, CihanUniversity-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, IraqFollow
Areen Jamal Fadhil, Department of Information System Engineering,Follow

Corresponding Author

Ghassan A. QasMarrogy

Authors ORCID

0000-0002-2817-9896

Document Type

Research Article

Abstract

IEEE 802.11 based Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) are becoming popular in home, enterprise and public access areas primarily due to their low cost, simplicity of installation and high data rates. While WLANs continue to be predominantly data centric, there is growing interest in using WLANs for voice and text data especially in enterprise markets. In this paper, a comprehensive analysis comparison to measure the delay, throughput packet loss and retransmission attempts was done to different scenarios using different trending wireless protocols such as 802.11n (2.4GHz, 5GHz), 802.11g, 802.11b, 802.11a while transferring low and high data load in FANET, with two major routing protocols AODV, and OLSR. As concluded in the result, recent wireless technology 802.11n with frequency band such of 2.4GHz can give better performance as they transfer higher data rates with longer distances and frequency band of 5GHz with higher data rate and less distance than 2.4GHz.

Keywords

FANET, Data Rate, Wireless Protocols, Routing Protocols, 802.11, Bandwidth

How to Cite This Article

qasmarrogy, Ghassan A. and Fadhil, Areen Jamal (2011) "A Comparative Study of Different FANET 802.11 Wireless Protocols with Different Data Loads," Polytechnic Journal: Vol. 12: Iss. 1, Article 8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v12n1y2022.pp61-66

References

Antonioli, D., Siby, S. and Tippenhauer, N.O., 2017, November. Practical Evaluation of Passive COTS Eavesdropping in 802.11 b/n/ac WLAN. In International Conference on Cryptology and Network Security (pp. 415-435). Springer, Cham.

de Carvalho, J.P., Veiga, H., Pacheco, C.R. and Reis, A.D., 2021. Extended Performance Research on IEEE 802.11 a WPA Multi-node Laboratory Links. In Transactions on Engineering Technologies (pp. 175-186). Springer, Singapore.

Elhabyan, R., Shi, W. and St-Hilaire, M., 2019. Coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks: Review and future directions. Journal of Communications and Networks, 21(1), pp.45-60.

Jain, R. and Kashyap, I., 2019. An QoS aware link defined OLSR (LD-OLSR) routing protocol for MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 108(3), pp.1745-1758.

Kaewkiriya, T., 2017, April. Performance comparison of Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11 ac and Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11 n. In 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems, Computing and IT Applications (CSCITA) (pp. 235-240). IEEE.

Katila, C.J., Di Gianni, A., Buratti, C. and Verdone, R., 2017, June. Routing protocols for video surveillance drones in IEEE 802.11 s Wireless Mesh Networks. In 2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Ketshabetswe, L.K., Zungeru, A.M., Mangwala, M., Chuma, J.M. and Sigweni, B., 2019. Communication protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison. Heliyon, 5(5), p.e01591.

Khorov, E., Kiryanov, A., Lyakhov, A. and Bianchi, G., 2018. A tutorial on IEEE 802.11 ax high efficiency WLANs. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(1), pp.197-216.

Mourad, A., Muhammad, S., Al Kalaa, M.O., Hoeher, P.A. and Refai, H., 2017, March. Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11 n system coexistence in the automotive domain. In 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE

Nourildean, S.W., Salih, A.M. and Othman, K.M., 2021. AODV, DSR and OLSR routing protocols investigation on virtual local area network. Materials Today: Proceedings.

QasMarrogy, G., 2021. Evaluation of Flying Ad Hoc Network Topologies, Mobility Models, and IEEE Standards for Different Video Applications. ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY, 9(1), pp.77-88.

QasMarrogy, G.A. and Almashhadani, Y.S., 2019, April. AODV Inherent Techniques comparison for detecting and eliminating the black hole attack nodes in MANET. In 3rd International Conference on Communication Engineering and Computer Science (CIC-COCOS’19).

QasMarrogy, G.A., 2020. Optimizing video transmission performance in 5GHz MANET. Journal of Duhok University, 23(2), pp.402-411.

QasMarrogy, G.A., 2021. FANET Drone's 4K Data Applications, Mobility Models and Wi-Fi IEEE802. 11n Standards. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, (1), pp.51-55.

QasMarrogy, G.A., 2021. Improving VoIP transmission for IEEE 802.11 n 5GHz MANET. Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 33(1), pp.157-162.

Rochim, A.F., Harijadi, B., Purbanugraha, Y.P., Fuad, S. and Nugroho, K.A., 2020, February. Performance comparison of wireless protocol IEEE 802.11 ax vs 802.11 ac. In 2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

surrounding areas," Int J Technol Emerg Engin Res, vol. 2, pp. 71-76, 2014.

U. Karimah, R. Melati, and A. A. S. R. Saputri, "PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF LOCAL HONEY FROM EAST KALIMANTAN," Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan, vol. 38, pp. 119-128, 2020.

W. H. Organization, Codex alimentarius: organically produced foods: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2001.

W. Horwitz, Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Volume I, agricultural chemicals, contaminants, drugs/edited by William Horwitz: Gaithersburg (Maryland): AOAC International, 1997., 2010.

Y. Posudin, "Spectroscopic analysis of honey," Ukrainian food journal, pp. 437-450, 2016.

Publication Date

8-14-2011