•  
  •  
 

Corresponding Author

Zhyan A. Ahmed

Authors ORCID

0000-0003-0396-3059

Document Type

Research Article

Abstract

Drought is among the most severe natural calamities induced by lack of water, having a negative implication on water resources and agriculture in the affected area. Drought types and severity vary by location, so understanding the spatial distribution can aid in developing measures to overcome this natural hazard. In this study, the areas vulnerable to droughts in the Mandawa watershed in the Kurdistan region of Iraq were determined by employing seven associated factors: rainfall, temperature, LULC, surfaceslope, soil texture, elevation, and distance to rivers. Satellite imagery of Landsat 8 OLI for 2021was employed to create the Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) and distance to rivers maps. The elevation and surface slope maps have been generated from the Digital Elevation Modelat 30 m resolution, soil texture map was extracted from The FAO Digital Soil Map of the Worldand the inverse distance weighting method was utilized to interpolate the rainfall and temperature throughout the watershed. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)was used to create a pairwise compression matrix to obtain the weight of each parameter. In the Geographic Information System (GIS)environment, the combined impact of affecting factors was utilized to create the area's drought zonation map. The results indicated that only 5.2% and 13.8% of the study area is vulnerable to extreme and severe droughts, respectively. While more than 35% of the watershed is hardly vulnerable to droughts.

Keywords

drought vulnerability assessment, AHP, GIS, Remote sensing (RS), drought vulnerability factors

References

ALSHAIKH, A. Y. 2015. Space applications for drought assessment in Wadi-Dama (West Tabouk), KSA. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18, S43-S53.

BAYISSA, Y., MASKEY, S., TADESSE, T., VAN ANDEL, S. J., MOGES, S., VAN GRIENSVEN, A. & SOLOMATINE, D. 2018. Comparison of the performance of six drought indices in characterizing historical drought for the upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Geosciences, 8, 81.

CHOPRA, P. Drought risk assessment using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Gujarat. 2006. ITC Enschede, The Netherlands.

FADHIL, A. M. 2011. Drought mapping using Geoinformation technology for some sites in the Iraqi Kurdistan region. International Journal of Digital Earth, 4, 239-257.

GAZNAYEE, H. & AL-QURAISHI, A. M. F. 2019. Analysis of agricultural drought’s severity and impacts in Erbil Province, the Iraqi Kurdistan Region based on time series NDVI and TCI indices for 1998 through 2017. Jour of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 11, 287-297.

HOQUE, M., PRADHAN, B., AHMED, N. & ALAMRI, A. 2021. Drought Vulnerability Assessment Using Geospatial Techniques in Southern Queensland, Australia. Sensors, 21, 6896.

KALURA, P., PANDEY, A., CHOWDARY, V. & RAJU, P. 2021. Assessment of hydrological drought vulnerability using geospatial techniques in the tons river basin, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 49, 2623-2637.

KRG 2021. Meteorological Department of the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources, Kurdistan Region Government (KRG), Iraq.

MISHRA, A. K. & SINGH, V. P. 2010. A review of drought concepts. Journal of hydrology, 391, 202-216.

MOKARRAM, M. & ZAREI, A. R. 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using fuzzy-AHP. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 36, 3931-3943.

NASROLLAHI, M., KHOSRAVI, H., MOGHADDAMNIA, A., MALEKIAN, A. & SHAHID, S. 2018. Assessment of drought risk index using drought hazard and vulnerability indices. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 1-12.

PALCHAUDHURI, M. & BISWAS, S. 2016. Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India. Natural Hazards, 84, 1905-1920.

PANDEY, V. & SRIVASTAVA, P. 2018. Integration of satellite, global reanalysis data and macroscale hydrological model for drought assessment in sub-tropical region of India. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, 42.

PEREIRA, J. M. & DUCKSTEIN, L. 1993. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. International journal of geographical Information science, 7, 407-424.

POGARČIĆ, I., FRANČIĆ, M. & DAVIDOVIĆ, V. Application of AHP method in traffic planning. 16th International Symposium on Electronics in traffic planning, 2008.

SAATY, T. L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15, 234-281.

SINGH, G. R., JAIN, M. K. & GUPTA, V. 2019. Spatiotemporal assessment of drought hazard, vulnerability and risk in the Krishna River basin, India. Natural Hazards, 99, 611-635.

STEFANIDIS, S. & STATHIS, D. 2013. Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Natural hazards, 68, 569-585.

SWAIN, S., MISHRA, S. K., PANDEY, A. & KALURA, P. 2022. Inclusion of groundwater and socio-economic factors for assessing comprehensive drought vulnerability over Narmada River Basin, India: A geospatial approach. Applied Water Science, 12, 1-16.

VAN LOON, A. & LAAHA, G. 2015. Hydrological drought severity explained by climate and catchment characteristics. Journal of hydrology, 526, 3-14.

WILHITE, D. A. & GLANTZ, M. H. 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water international, 10, 111-120.

YALCIN, A. & BULUT, F. 2007. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Natural Hazards, 41, 201-226.

ZAGADE, N. D. & UMRIKAR, B. N. 2021. Drought severity modeling of upper Bhima river basin, western India, using GIS–AHP tools for effective mitigation and resource management. Natural Hazards, 105, 1165-1188.

ZAREI, A. R., MOGHIMI, M. M. & KOOHI, E. 2021. Sensitivity assessment to the occurrence of different types of droughts using GIS and AHP techniques. Water Resources Management, 35, 3593-3615.

Publication Date

2-1-2023

Download

Included in

Life Sciences Commons

Share

COinS